Major Donor Communication

Share

By Joanna Nixon, Achieve Consultant

Staying in touch with a donor after a gift has been made is equally as important as soliciting the gift. Keeping donors informed and engaged is a critical component to the donor cultivation process, especially major donors. Whether you are communicating in-person as part of an update meeting or sending a written correspondence, touching base on an ongoing basis with your significant financial supporters is a must. Below is a template that can be used to frame your messaging to major donors. Be careful not to overwhelm with too much information and focus on those areas that you think would appeal to the individual supporter. A one page update is more than sufficient. While donors will likely receive your annual report and maybe an e-newsletter, a communication specifically targeted at the major donor from the Executive Director can go a long way.

 

What Happens to a Dream Deferred: Is the Senior Gift Living Up to Its Expectations?

Share
By Dvorit Mausner
Associate Director, Young Alumni Participation

The Penn Fund, University of Pennsylvania

Young alumni giving rates are noticeably low across many institutions. Granted, these (potential) donors are overworked, underpaid, and transient, however the same was true of them as the senior class, if not even more so then. Yet in that time while surrounded by peer influence, some senior gift programs consistently attract 50-90% participation. Unfortunately, a typical drop-off in the following year might short the annual fund three-quarters of these new donors—from ever-increasing denominators—and retention does not necessarily rise in correlation with senior class record-breaking.

Curiously, compensation for this participation vacuum falls on older alumni classes where donor acquisition is particularly costly and for whom senior gift training wheels were not nearly as common. The difference ought to be levied by the young alumni themselves.

Despite this post-graduation plummet, there is still hope that senior class donors can become annual and lifetime contributors. Simply, this behavior requires habituation best reinforced in alumni year one and again every year after.
For retention rates that flatter the fanatical effort of the senior gift, assess two critical issues:
  • What portion of the senior gift is gimmick; what portion is educational and future-oriented?
    • Gimmicks like T-shirts, class parties, and plaques may be the difference between 50% and 80% senior participation.
    • Education may be the difference between 20% and 50% young alumni participation. Or perhaps 80% young alumni participation.
  • What stewardship and solicitation plan is in place to transition and retain senior donors?
    • Senior donors are not the same as alumni donors. One gift is not yet a habit.
    • If the senior gift drives at 60 MPH, young alumni will fly through the windshield if they experience a sudden halt in tailored attention. How is momentum maintained after graduation?
In the tweeting interim before their first reunion, recent graduates will naturally form daily, weekly, and monthly customs of great personal importance (eg. happy hours, potlucks, and Netflix streaming). However, what about that significant annual tradition, which reestablishes a cumulative impact, collective vote of confidence, and the power of the aggregate? Fear not. Young alumni will diligently remember to use up their Groupons, just before yearly expiration.

As for annual giving participation at their alma mater? Without considerable reinforcement, better luck next year, maybe.

Development programs that emphasize young alumni annual giving are less likely to defer their dream; senior gifts can live up to expectations but that success is not predetermined. Institutions that evaluate the success of undergraduate advancement based on senior class participation alone are only telling half the story. The most salient results come down the line through retention statistics, and so habituation should be the

Five Fundraising Mistakes We Make with Our Boards

Share

Too often nonprofit board members shy away from fundraising. When the subject comes up, many trustees suddenly become invisible or silent. Yet it is our responsibility to set up board members in active, satisfying roles that can support the fundraising process.

But we frequently make mistakes that hurt, rather than help, our cause. How do we go wrong when we approach them about helping in fundraising? Here are five common mistakes that cause board members to back off when they should be pitching in.

1.    Asking for money, not building and keeping friends. Many board members are mistaken about fundraising. They think it is “asking for money.”

The actual moment of asking for a gift, however, is only one small step in the long, time-consuming process of building relationships with donors.

Board members don’t realize the myriad activities that go into the fundraising process-identifying potential donors, cultivating and involving them in an organization, and, of course, finding ways to thank donors and foster their long-term relationship with our cause.
They skip directly to the most difficult and awkward part of the fundraising cycle.

If we can get our board members to change their point of view and have them focus first on making friends who then join our organization’s bandwagon as donors-then everyone wins.

We should never allow our good-hearted, well-meaning but nervous board members to get away with equating the entire process of fundraising with the act of soliciting.
2.    Cold or “cool” calls. Cold calls are the worst possible place to use the energy and good will of your kind-hearted board members, because cold calls have the highest rate of failure.

We should never subject our board members to this kind of rejection, which will incline them never to venture out for you again. Preserve their self-esteem and protect them from negative responses if you want their continued help. Why would they keep beating their heads against a wall if they are rarely successful?

Send them on easy calls that will create fun, shared vision, and passion for your organization, calls that will make them happy and give them confidence. Send them out to make friends for your organization and engage the community with their passion.

I work hard to preserve my board members’ good feelings about being involved in fundraising. I nurture their interest, starting them off with simple tasks to encourage them, such as thanking current donors or cultivating someone at an event.
Then, after they develop some confidence, I bring them along on a formal cultivation or solicitation call. I will rarely send a board member out to solicit alone, and only if I think he or she is a carefully prepared, experienced fundraiser.
After one of my Fired Up for Fundraising Board Retreats, a trustee once said to me,

“This was so helpful. Before when someone mentioned fundraising, I immediately imagined cold calls. You have shown me that I can help in fundraising in lots of much easier ways. Fundraising is not necessarily cold calls at all; in fact, good fundraising is everything but cold calls.”

3.   Too many calls at too low a dollar level. If we are going to use board members in solicitations, then it is important to plan carefully the best use of their time in order to make the most of their valuable contacts and limited availability.

I have seen well-meaning but scared volunteers bravely step up to the plate, willing to make annual giving solicitations in person. Then the thankful but overly optimistic staff loads them up with far too many visits to make at one time.

Worse, the calls are for meager amounts of money. It is much better to focus our board members on fewer calls at much higher dollar levels. I believe in asking board members to make only three calls at any one time. Focus on quality, not quantity.

Use your valuable board members carefully where you need them the most, and where they will do the most good.

4.      Emergency fundraising, not long-term relationships. I am all for a sense of urgency when raising funds. But all too often we wait until a crisis to mobilize our board members.

Then the conversation really does become all about money rather than about the great work our organization is doing for community good.

At such times, we ask board members to help pull in money quickly to respond to a budget shortfall or cover some major financial loss.

Again we are setting them up for unpleasant fundraising experiences. In these cases, they will usually create a conversation about “money,” not about a vision for a stronger, healthier community or a better world.

5.   Lack of training, structure, coaching, and support. We often send our trustees out with too little preparation and backup. We tend to forget that they are volunteers.

They are not the pros that we are. Do not make the mistake of assuming that your board members understand fundraising, or how to talk about your organization.

Be sure they have a solid understanding of the underlying philosophy of fundraising-which is developing donors/investors/partners who will stick with your organization for the long run.

They need-and deserve-first-rate support from staff. You will find that board members deeply appreciate this kind of backup.

They need clear goals, clear organizational structure, and inspiration to wake up their passion and keep personal commitment to your organization’s success.

Indy’s First Nonprofit/ Social Media TweetUp!

Share

Last night we hosted #SMindyNP, a social media networking event to bring together nonprofit and technology professionals in Indianapolis. Indy is a very active city for social media as well as a great place for nonprofits. We wanted to host a networking event because the relationship between the tech world and the nonprofit world is growing, and it’s important to build connections that bridge the two communities.

I was thrilled with the event.  It went so well that we are already talking about the next one we would like to host. The best part, for me, was meeting the people I had talked to on Facebook and Twitter “in real life” and watching the interactions and conversations between familiar faces and those I had just met. It was really exciting to read the feedback we received from attendees using the official event hashtag in real time during the event.

We would like to host another #SMindyNP when the weather gets warmer and we can be outside, but I would love to get even more feedback on the event. Even if you were not there, suggestions about what you would like to see at the next #SMindyNP would be great to have! I want the next one to be even better than the first! Please leave a comment, or let me know on Achieve’s Facebook and Twitter!